🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive action to prohibit social networking access for young people below 16 is creating waves worldwide. Politicians, child protection groups, and parents are watching closely to see if this tactic will become a template for other nations.

The European Movement

Throughout Europe, a rising group of states are moving toward parallel measures.

• The Danish government has stated a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the PM declaring that smartphones and platforms are "robbing our kids' childhood". The policy is expected to be enacted next year.
• The Norwegian government is set to implement a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to shield children from the "influence of the AI".
• Ireland is working on a online verification tool to confirm the age and identity of social media participants. The media minister have suggested that an Australia-style ban could be "an tools under consideration".
• In Spain, the prime minister has asked lawmakers to enact a bill lifting the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has recommended a related action, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Netherlands has advised families to block their youngsters from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has adopted a non-binding resolution demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 without guardian approval is provided. While it cautions of the "addictive" nature of these services, the move does not enact mandatory rules.

"A strong age limit is a solid foundation," said a leading MEP supporting the resolution.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Approach

For the United Kingdom, the government has kept open a possible ban, arguing that "no option is off the table" but maintaining any action must be "based on robust evidence".

Last year, support built behind a legislative effort to enact restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately weakened. However, the government vowed to conduct more studies the matter.

Charities have voiced warnings. One foundation set up by the family of a girl who took her own life after being exposed to dangerous platform posts contends that a blanket age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could result in a "dangerous transition" of harm when users reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the failure of the social media companies to build products and services that are secure and suitable for minors," commented a influential peer.

The United States: A Fragmented Landscape

In the United States, regulation is mostly happening at the state level due to national gridlock.

• Utah requires adult approval for minors to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a measure barring children under fourteen from joining social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a law limiting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with extra access requiring parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also introduced laws mandating parental consent for teenagers to set up social media accounts.

Despite cross-party agreement and calls from some politicians to mimic Australia's example, a federal ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Perspectives

Apart from the West, other states are also taking action.

• Malaysia plans to ban social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• Brazil has lifted the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

However, global agencies take a more cautious stance. A major UN agency has warned that social media bans have downsides and "could backfire". The body highlights that the internet can be a "critical link" for isolated youth and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to invest in user protection.

As this worldwide discussion continues, the policies of Australia and its followers indicate that states globally are increasingly content to stand by for tech companies to self-regulate.